Testbeam Summary Paper


The goal of this paper is to summarize the performance and results obtained during several testbeam calibration periods (2000-2003).

Here you can find the proposed scheme of the paper (as discussed during the June AW) as well as individual contributions written by the respective convenors (people listed against the sections/subsections). Please have a look to the abstracts and send comments to the respective convenor and reviewer of the whole section (people listed in parentheses) if you have any suggestion. Matteo Cavalli-Sforza and Jim Pilcher kindly agreed to be the main reviewers of the whole paper.
 
The paper will be written in the LaTeX format using the Elsevier's style. Have a look to the general instruction for authors and how to use the elsart style. Click here for downloading the mentioned style. Please consult also our guidelines (PDF or LaTeX source) and the PAW macro that sets the style for plots (ROOT users please adjust fonts etc accordingly).

Check also our spelling conventions  (last update 24.3.2007)

The total size of the paper should not exceed 50 pages , therefore we decided to impose the limits on each section (the first two might be merged in the future, therefore a common limit is set) - see the red numbers on the right.

After considering all comments to the version below, final version of the TB paper was submitted to CDS (ATL-TILECAL-PUB-2009-002)

TB Paper: full draft (PS)  (last update 19.12.2008, includes all sections)

Please provide comments to this draft of 19.12.2008.



You can also pick up tbpaper_def.tex containing some LaTeX definitions used in the paper (last update 24.3.2007) and the general skeleton tbpaper.tex

Older draft (11.7.2006) with the older sectioning can be found here.

TB Paper Structure:

Abstract (Jim Pilcher): draft5.tex  (4.2.2009)

Section 1: Introduction (Bob Stanek)  draft4.6(TeX)    (9.2.2009)        <=5 pages together with Section 2

Section 2: Energy reconstruction (Tomas Davidek): draft1.7(TeX)  (4.2.2009) (see the limit above)

Section 3: Calibration and monitoring systems (Jim Pilcher): draft8.2 (TeX)  (8.2.2009)  <=12 pages

short description, performance and stability of:

Section 4: Performance for particles (Tomas Davidek): draft8.2 (TeX) (8.2.2009)    <=27 pages

Summary of the results, results from several independent analysis should be included and should match. Where possible, comparison with MC should be given - please contact Andrea Dotti and/or Anna Lupi for MC samples/results.

Section 5: Summary and conclusions (Matteo Cavalli-Sforza): draft4.2 (TeX)   (10.2.2009)

Appendices: draft1.4(TeX)  (11.2.2009)    <=6 pages

References: draft18 (TeX)            (12.2.2009)

Tomas Davidek, last update 2.3.2009